按Enter到主內容區
:::

犯罪被害人保護服務白皮書

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:111-07-21
  • 資料點閱次數:591

● 主管機關:法務部

● 執行機構:國立臺北大學犯罪學研究所 

● 研究期間:10706 ~ 10809

● 中文關鍵字:被害人保護;被害人支持;網絡合作;創傷知情;刑事司法

●英文關鍵字:victim protection;victim support;networking;trauma-informed care;criminal justice 

● 中文摘要:

我國犯罪被害人保護政策自1998年犯罪被害人保護法立法迄今,大多數仰賴地檢署以及財團法人犯罪被害人保護協會各地分會提供被害人及其家屬第一線服務。犯罪被害人保護服務的提供長期受限於中央政策缺乏整合以及地方行動未能與縣市政府網絡合作與結盟。本白皮書採用了比較個案研究法、次級資料分析、以及焦點團體等資料蒐集方式,整合性地回顧犯罪被害保護之國際趨勢與檢討現行法制、政策、服務提供的成效和限制。白皮書奠基於2017年司法改革國是會議後的決議以及修正之加強犯罪被害人保護方案(2018.12.28)的架構上,目的為提出犯罪被害人保護政策長期性、指導性的主軸、策略與行動建言。 白皮書分為五章:背景、犯罪被害保護之國際趨勢、我國犯罪被害保護政策之現況檢視與願景、策略與行動方案、以及結論與建議。第一章的背景說明了犯罪被害人保護法立法以來,在法令與犯罪被害人保護政策的變革,可以看出原為行政院層級的方案卻在歷次修正中逐漸限縮範圍,整合功能十分有限。雖然各保護架構間存在著正式與非正式的聯繫與合作關係,但尚未建立一套以被害人權益為中心的指導網領以結合中央與地方、政府與民間的資源和行動。從第二章的國際趨勢分析來看,國際組織以及標竿國家在1985年的聯合國基本宣言以來,已朝向保障被害人在刑事司法系統中應有的權利以及獲得協助的權利發展,具體實踐在被害人權利的相關立法以及被害人接受服務最低標準、及被害人章程中。其次,刑事司法程序中設置專人或單一窗口以支持、協助被害人和獨立的民間組織提供長期支持缺一不可。 第三章藉由次級資料與焦點座談等方式檢視現行犯罪被害人保護協會服務的進展與限制,發現目前全由國家出資的被害人服務組織,以及提供以犯罪被害人保護法規範之被害人及服務項目顯然太過狹隘,且民間的倡議與監督能量明顯不足。在訴訟協助、損害回復與經濟安全、保護網絡、身心回復與服務品質等各方面,均發現仍有亟待改善之處。基此,第四章的策略與行動方案中,根據他國的經驗及我國現況檢視提出五項核心工作:將被害人支持提升到權利層次、從教育與倡議推展創傷知情/同理的社會文化、落實犯罪被害人保護基金以建構個案之重分配正義、財團法人犯罪被害人保護協會改造以提升專業自主性、以及犯罪被害人保護機構配置合理資源與專業服務人力。在訴訟協助部分提出五大建議:擴大被害保護犯罪類型、律定被害人程序主體地位、維護被害人個資隱私保障、確保被害人資訊獲悉權、以及建制被害人法律扶助權等。在經濟安全部分,提出三項建議:整合與提升被害人經濟求償權、徹底改革補償金流程以提升效率與減少二次傷害、以及於地方政府層級建立資源整合平台提升經濟安全支持系統等。在網絡服務部分,提出建立中央與地方網絡合作以及建立政府與民間夥伴關係兩項建議。在身心回復部分,提出以設計思惟模式發展以被害人為中心的網絡合作及服務流程以及發展與國際接軌之循證的多元化被害人支持服務兩項建議。第五章總結白皮書的內容並表列各項短程或中長程建議的目標、策略與行動及主責、協辦單位。

● 英文摘要:

Since the Victim Protection Act was enacted in 1998, the services to victims and their families have been delivered by the District Prosecution Offices and the 21 offices of Association for Victims Support. However, current service provision is limited due to fragmented central policy and weak connection and poor collaboration with networks in local governments. Using data collected by comparative case study, secondary data analysis, and focus groups, the White Paper intends to review the international trends of victim support, investigate the existing effectiveness and hindrance of domestic legislation, policy, and service for crime victims. The White Paper has its foundation on the decisions made by the Presidential Judicial Reform National Committee and newly revised Strengthening Crime Victim Protection Project (2018.12.28). The Aim of the White Paper is to propose long-term policy suggestions for victim issue related agenda-setting, strategy-building, and action plan. The White Paper is divided into five chapters, namely background, international trend of victim support, the current victim policy review and vision, strategy and action plan, and conclusion and suggestion. In Chapter 1, we describe the historical development of Crime Victim Protection Act and Crime Victim Protection Policy. It is found that the latter, which was supposed to be at Ministry level, but in fact has been downsized through years, causing very limited advance in integrated work. Although different protection organizations have some formal or informal connection and cooperation, victim-centred guidelines to combine the resources and actions between central and local governments and between public and private sectors are yet to be developed. According to the analysis of international trend in Chapter 2, several international organizations and benchmark countries have made efforts to secure victim’s rights in criminal justice systems and rights for services. The focus of victim’s rights is exemplified by Victim’s Right legislations and minimum standard of victim service and Victim’s Charter. In addition, it is important to have fulltime supporting staff or victim’s desk to support and assist victims during the criminal justice process. It is also important to have independent civil organizations to provide long term support. Chapter 3 investigates the progress and limitations of current victim services. Through focus groups and interviews, we have found that both the current definition of “crime victims” and “protection services” to be too narrow. Nation fund victim service organization seldom played the role as a significant policy advocator and inspector. We found several weakness in terms of legal aid, restitution and economic security, protection network, physical and emotional recovery, and service quality. Based on our findings from foreign experiences and domestic practices, we propose five core tasks: upgrading victim “services” to victim “rights”, promoting trauma-informed and sympathetic social culture through education, establishing victim support fund to secure distributive justice for the victims, organizational reform to promote the profession and autonomy of the Association for Victims Support, and lastly, reasonable resources and professional staffs for victim protection organizations. Regarding legal aid in court, we propose five suggestions: expand the legal definition of crime victims, regulate the procedural status of victims, protect the privacy of victims, ensure the victims’ entitlement of information, and promote the victim rights of legal aid. Regarding the economic security, three suggestions are: provide victims’ rights for restitution and compensation, reform the national compensation to promote efficiency and reduce secondary victimization, and establish a municipal/county level resources platform for economic support. As to physical and emotional recovery, we propose firstly, a design-thinking model and victim centred networking and service procedure, and secondly, evidence-based multiple victim support services which keep up with the international development on best practices. In Chapter 5, the summary of White Paper and listed suggestions are provided to address the key players, and the aims, strategy, and actions for short or longer term policy development. 

● 文章連結:

https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=12565586

● 資料來源:

GRB政府研究資訊系統

回頁首