● 中文摘要：

      本研究以台南地檢署推動「修復式司法試行方案」的實踐歷程為民族誌研究的對象，以方案執行者之一的TWR協會為研究場域，描繪修復式司法在台南地區實踐的樣貌，並探究台南地檢署的試辦經驗對於「修復式司法應用於家庭暴力」的爭論產生何種反饋。
研究發現，被害人與加害人對「修復式司法」一知半解的情況形成TWR協會啟動「被害人與加害人調解」的阻礙。此外，作為偵查對象之「犯罪事實」與作為「被害人與加害人調解」程序欲處理的「家暴問題」內涵不一致的家暴事件特殊性，為修復促進者帶來二大難題：「被害人與加害人調解」程序的標的不易特定範圍，以及「被害人」與「加害人」身分不易清楚區辨。本文也以TWR協會對修復式司法的詮釋與修復促進者的調解經驗之因素來解釋，修復促進者面臨對話困境時，會傾向採取以下策略，包括（1）使用「調解」語彙重新包裝所進行的程序、（2）是否回顧關係史中的創傷，取決於婚姻此制度性關係是否繼續，以及（3）道歉儀式創造與訴諸良好的親職實踐，進而得以向台南地檢署回覆對話目的已達。
田野資料也顯示，修復式程序與緩起訴制度相配套的制度設計影響修復促進者與其他程序參與者權力階序之形成，以及隨之而來的溝通落差，使得於正式犯罪追訴程序以外進行的「被害人與加害人調解」程序，出現檢察體系「不在場的在場」之現象，不利於被害人與加害人間自主溝通平台的建立。

● English Abstract：

     In this study, ethnography methodology was predominately conducted. The researcher investigated the Program for Promotion of the Restorative Justice Pilot of Tainan District Prosecutors Office. The purposes of this study were first to deeply understand what restorative justice practices really look like and secondly to spark new conversations about how to meet the needs of abused women and the goal of restorative justice.
The result of this study showed that the facilitators face the problems in the practice, of which victims and offenders involved with VOM lack an understanding of restorative justice, and that the needs of victims are different from the facts of crime. Facilitators therefore develop three strategies, which are“referring restorative justice to mediation”, “discouraging the victim storytelling as she has decided to end relationship with the offender”, and“creating the apology ritual and highlighting a lot of points on the responsibility of being a mother/father”.
Besides, VOM as a part of criminal processing system makes the facilitators seek to mobile the power of formal sanctions, which will place pressure on the offenders to reconcile with their victims.

● 文章連結：

https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j5p2y2

● 資料來源：

臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統