● 中文摘要：

　　有鑑於我國近年來刑事政策之一再修訂，且最近二次政策性修訂，在假釋門檻的修正均朝提高的方向及參考國外三振法案精神對再犯重罪不得提報假釋之重刑化刑事政策，惟其對於降低累再犯率或撤銷假率其效果並不顯著，對再犯問題而言，本研究將藉由目前刑事司法機構內與機構外之處遇與連結狀況之檢視，瞭解其是否能發揮其功效減少再犯問題，並進而研究如何建立有效銜接機構內與機構外處遇之中間機制，以真正協助出獄人利回歸社會，滅少再犯罪之狀況。 邊沁（Bentham）曾謂：「犯人出獄，最為危險，如自樓降地，設無階梯，則非傷即死」，因此機構內與機構外處遇之連結與中間性銜接機制，至為重要。本研究將對國內機構內與機構外處遇所執行之主要業務（矯正教育及更生保護）成效加以評估，分析其內容、實施過程、成效與優劣點，藉以提升處遇成效，降低犯罪質量與再犯機率，並供相關政策與方案修訂之參考，同時介紹外國機構內與機構外處遇制度及矯治方案，進而探討我國現行制度之優劣，並提出改進意見。期能引起各界對犯罪人矯正處遇制度之重視，能從機構外至機構內，重新檢討規劃妥適制度，以落實假釋制度之立法美意。最後，本研究將提供一個整合機構內、機構外與中間性銜接機制之具體可行方案，以為政府制定相關處遇政策，協助出獄人成功復歸社會，減少再犯之問題 在研究對象方面，本研究將對國內實際接觸機構內與機構外處遇之人員進行調查，其中機構內處遇部分研究對象為矯正機構人員（含教誨師及作業導師）、以及在監受刑人；機構外處遇部分研究對象為觀護人及更生保護人員、以及假釋出獄人。全部樣本人數計約3200人。 在研究資料收集上，本計畫將對研究議題，分成二大部分項目來加以考察：（一）中間銜接機制可行性評估；（二）機構內、外處遇主觀經驗分析與相關使用者意向調查。在中間銜接機制可行性評估方面，將採目標評估、結果評估、效能評估途徑，藉以探討比較國內、外在刑事司法機構內與機構外之處遇與連結概況。此外，在主觀經驗分析與使用者意向調查方面，擬以自編問卷方式進行，問卷之設計將依循學理之假設、參考國內外機構內與機構外處遇相關文獻及方案實施經驗，並聽取學者專家及司法機關實務人員的見解，編成具專家效度之問卷；並成立焦點座談團體，邀集犯罪學、刑罰學界及實務界等相關領域之學者專家，就問卷初稿提供寶貴之修改意見，並將焦點團體座談討論結果彙整、分析。 在研究資料分析上，研究結果將分為量的分析與質的分析兩個部分加以處理。「量化分析」係將受試者在量表之反應所得的資料分別予以計分，並進行統計分析考驗。此一部份資料分析期望建立刑事司法機構內與機構外之處遇成效評估線性迴歸模型，並藉以彙整出具影響力之因子。「質性分析」係依據質性訪談內容及焦點團體座談資料，分析研究對象有效、確切且可信的主觀經驗資料，繼而對現行方案執行過程作整體檢視。並與量化資料來相互印證。 

● English Abstract:

     In the process of custody, one critical issue is to reduce re-offending of criminal when they back to community. From the rehabilitation strategy perspective, a preparation for prisoner release seems play an important role in the custody process. As research review in currently, ex-prisoners who had treated preparation for release show lower recidivism rate, fewer psychological shock from the community, and higher adaptation in the social environment. However, preparation for release services that connect pre-release and after-release are need to investigate in Taiwan. The primary purposes are to investigate the efficacy of current custody process and treatment program in Taiwan; and the feasibility to build specific institutes or services of the preparation for prisoner release. Three groups of participants were recruited, which including: the prisoners (in-prison and ex-prison), the correction related government officers (prison manager and probation officer), and the aftercare related non-government organization (NGO) service providers (aftercare association, halfway house and career employment center). The research method of this study is complementary. Under the experimental structure, we using the literature review, qualitative interview, questionnaire survey, and expert focus group as the triangulation of reliability and validity in this study. In the qualitative approach, 4 ex-prisoners with aftercare experiences will be interviewed. The form items were mainly around the topics of subjective experiences about aftercare, and personal advices to the process of custody. In the quantitative approach, questionnaire survey will be practiced. The contents of the survey consist of four parts as the followings: demographic, career training/employment, placement, and education/treatment programs. Clustered proportionate random sampling with stratification will be used to help normalize distributions. Totally 93 correction related institutes were distributed sampled around Taiwan, and 2600 copies will be delivered to the subjects. The results will be analyzed by the SPSS statistics software. Besides, 4 sessions of expert focus groups will be held, topics similar with interview form will be deeply discussed by experts and senior service providers from the criminal justice related field. 

● 文章連結：

https://goo.gl/h89Pa6

● 資料來源：

政府研究資訊系統 GRB