按Enter到主內容區
:::

從「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」探討兩岸跨境毒品犯罪問題及防制策略 From the "cross-strait common fight against crime and mutual legal assistance agreement"Explore the cross border crime and drug control strat.

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-06-10
  • 資料點閱次數:150

 中文摘要:

 

  世界各國政府對於嚴重影響社會治安、人類衛生及國家正常發展的各種毒品犯罪,尤其是製造、運輸、販賣毒品等行為,均視為萬國公罪,無不採取嚴厲之防制措施,以求減低毒品之危害。在此情況下,打擊毒品走私現已成為海峽兩岸政府共同關切的議題。 隨著中國大陸改革開放後,毒品犯罪問題更是開始蔓延且快速成長,臺灣與中國大陸因為地裡位置接近,受其毒害亦相當嚴重。海峽兩岸自1987年政府開放國人赴大陸探親起,即由早期的對峙局勢,直到今日的和諧對話與廣泛交流。由於兩岸人民同文同種,民族習性、語言與風俗民情相近,導致在兩岸互動頻繁情勢下,衍生了諸多治安問題,使得跨境犯罪問題日益增多。 兩岸於2009年4月26日簽署了「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」,為兩岸共同打擊毒品犯罪開啟了新的里程碑,雖然透過此種合作模式已在初期獲得具體成效,但也出現了許多查緝困境有待解決。 本文將透過歷史制度論之分析理論,首先介紹兩岸在共同打擊毒品犯罪之歷史發展與政策變革,其次論述兩岸跨境毒品犯罪之現況與趨勢,然後針對協議執行迄今所遭遇之問題與防制策略加以檢討,最後提出研究發現與政策建議。

 

 English Abstract:

 

     Governments around the world to seriously affect social security, human health and the normal development of a variety of national drug-related crimes, particularly in the manufacturing, transportation, drug trafficking and other acts are considered public crimes nations, without exception, to take stringent control measures so as to minimize drug hazard. In this case, the fight against drug trafficking has become a cross-strait issues of common concern to the government. With the reform and opening up in China, drug crime is starting to spread and grow rapidly, Taiwan and mainland China because of the location close to the ground, by its poison is also very serious. Strait since 1987 to visit the mainland Chinese government to open up, that is, from the early confrontation situation until today harmonious dialogue and extensive exchanges. Because people on both sides the same cultural, ethnic habits, language and customs of the people are similar, resulting in frequent cross-strait interaction situation, derived many security problems, making cross-border crime is increasing. Strait on April 26, 2009 signed the "cross-strait common fight against crime and mutual legal assistance agreements," cross-strait common fight against drug crime opened a new milestone, although the model has been through such cooperation to obtain concrete results at an early stage, but there many seizing dilemma to be resolved. This paper will, through an analysis of historical institutionalism theory, first introduced in the joint fight against drug-related crimes on both sides of the historical development and policy changes, followed by cross-border drug crimes on both sides discussed the current status and trends, and for the implementation of the agreement of the problems encountered so far and prevention strategies be reviewed. Finally, research findings and policy recommendations.

 

● 文章連結:

http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/61190454184344127846

 

● 資料來源:

臺灣博碩士知識加值系統

回頁首