● 中文摘要：

　　有鑑於重大之毒品犯罪常具跨國性、集團性、科技性之特質與現象，此些特質及現象皆大幅提高了犯罪偵查之難度，故若非經由國際合作及運用特別之偵查方法，實顯難達到有效打擊與防制毒品氾濫之功。故「聯合國毒品和犯罪問題辦事處」(United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime；UNODC)便於西元1988年訂頒「聯合國禁止非法販運麻醉藥品暨精神藥物公約」（United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988），並於該公約中明文規定了「控制下交付」（Controlled Delivery）之條文明文鼓勵各國可運用「控制下交付」此一特別之偵查方法，來進行國與國間之合作。 惟我國至民國93年始於毒品危害防制條例第32-1條賦予「控制下交付」之法源依據，相較於日本之麻藥特別法與刑事訴訟法在運用此偵查技術偵查犯罪之成果，我國在此部分顯然較不成熟及陌生。在我國並非上述該公約之締約國，又受制於我國特殊之政經因素，在此情況下，我國勢必在查緝跨境毒品犯罪產生若干影響。在本論文第二章文獻探討部分整理「控制下交付」之相關概念、我國法律與實務之問題意識，並與其他偵查技術相比較。期能更瞭解此特殊偵查技術在我國之現況。 本論文並透過訪談實務上偵辦跨境毒品案類具代表性之執法人員，以瞭解偵辦跨境毒品犯罪之相關偵查作為、困境、建議與「控制下交付」在我國之運用現況。在文末之結論與建議部分，將重點置於提出對於實務上偵辦此類案件之建議與控制下交付未來於我國法令增修之參考。

● English Abstract:

     In view of the fact that major drug-related crimes are often characterized by transnational, syndical and technological features, which greatly increase the difficulty of criminal investigation, it is very difficult to effectively combat and prevent the proliferation of drugs without international cooperation and using special investigative methods. For the reason, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; UNODC promulgated United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988, and it expressly provides the article “Controlled Delivery”, which clearly encourages States to use this special method to conduct international cooperation. However, in Taiwan the article 32-1 of Against Narcotics Act, which conferred the article of Controlled Delivery form 2004, is obviously less mature and unfamiliar compared with the Japanese anesthetic special law and the Criminal Procedure Law. In the fact that our country is not the party to the Convention and due to our special political and economic factors, we must have a number of impacts in the investigation of cross-border drug-related crimes. In the literature part of this paper, we discuss the concept of "Controlled Delivery", the awareness of the problem between our law and practice, and the comparison of other investigative techniques. We hope to have a better understanding of the situation of this special investigative technique in our country. This paper also interviewed the representative law-executor of the cross-border drug-related crimes to understand the investigative behaviors, difficulties, suggestions and the situation of the application of "Controlled Delivery" in our country. At the conclusion part of this paper, we focus on proposing the recommendations on the practical investigation of such cases, and the references for the future upgrading of our law for Controlled Delivery.

● 文章連結：

https://hdl.handle.net/11296/nth25q

● 資料來源：

臺灣博碩士知識加值系統