按Enter到主內容區
:::

性侵害加害人刑後強制治療溯及既往規定之研究<P>The Research of Sexual Offender’s Compulsory Treatment after the Penalty of Retrospective.

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:97
有鑑於性侵害犯罪屢見不顯,性侵害犯罪加害人之處遇治療即相對受到社會重視,如何有效管控、監督加害人及降低再犯率,是性侵害犯罪者刑後處遇治療之重點。本文即先介紹性侵害犯罪加害人強制治療制度與立法沿革,包含性侵害犯罪之定義與我國歷次修法之背景與面臨之困境。其次以性侵害犯罪防治法第22條之1為中心,從定位、治療處所與評估鑑定程序等面向,探討該法條之爭議與問題,並提出美、德二國性侵犯處遇制度可得借鏡之處,另分析最高法院近期之相關判決,藉以瞭解實務見解。而對於軍中性侵犯之治療制度,在軍事審判法修正後,由司法機關主導下,軍中應如何配合與因應,將分別從修法前、後之比較與未來走向提出檢討。最後提出本文對於性侵害犯罪防治法第22條之1修法方向與建議。

Sexual offenses are common crimes in any society. Due to the high recidivism rate, compulsory treatment after execution of punishment is critical to reduce the rate. This thesis analyzes the retrospective provisions regarding compulsory treatment in the 2011 Amendment to Article 22-1 of the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act from four perspectives, the nature of treatment, its assessment procedure, its evaluation, and the comparison with practices in the United States and Germany. Sexual offenses committed by military and their compulsory treatment on offenders are under the civil jurisdiction since the effectiveness of 2013 amendment to the Code of Court Martial Procedure. A proposal will be provided for the military for policy considerations vis-a-vis emerged issues on civil jurisdiction over military sexual ffenders. Amendments to the compulsory treatment articles in force will be proposed as arguments for future legislation.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/22595967247268202093

回頁首