按Enter到主內容區
:::

性侵害犯罪處遇制度—以刑後強制治療為中心

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:104
針對性侵害犯罪如此使罪大惡極又再犯率極高的犯罪,各國政府無不希望利用各種監控處遇制度來降低其再犯可能性,本文主要即以2005年修法後之刑後強制治療為中心,探討該制度實務現況及爭議,並檢視相關法規定有無違反禁止溯及既往等其他憲法保障人權規定之疑慮,並與我國其他強制處分作比較,最後介紹外國相關性侵害處遇制度以作為借鏡,以期在對性侵害犯罪者作全面監控時不致過度侵害人權。

Sexual assault is a heinous crime with an excessively high rate of recidivism, which numerous governments have endeavored to reduce with various monitoring and treatment systems. This study is centered on the 2005 amendments to Article 91-1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China, which stipulates compulsory treatment after the penalty, and further examined the current implementation of, and disputes with this system. This study also explored whether compulsory treatment violated the non-retroactive principle and other human rights protected by constitutional law, comparing the system of compulsory treatment with other mandatory domestic punishments. Finally, international treatment systems for sexual assault were introduced as a reference to prevent human rights violations when conducting comprehensive monitoring on sex offenders.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/51718037175026564645

回頁首