按Enter到主內容區
:::

對幼年人性侵害犯罪及其審理之研究<P>A Study on Child Sexual Abuse Crimes and Trials.

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:124
在民國99年8、9月間,經大眾傳播媒體報導高雄地院性侵6歲幼童乙案,及最高法院性侵3歲幼童乙案,引起輿論撻伐、批評,進而引發本文想要探討對幼年人性侵害犯罪於實體面與程序面中,現行法制是否有應檢討之處。本文先就對幼年人性侵害犯罪作一基本分析,瞭解其犯罪趨勢、犯罪特性、性侵害迷思等,作為後續探討之基礎。進而分析我國刑法對幼年人性侵害犯罪之立法沿革,探討其規範保護法益、「性交」定義、行為方式隨著修法有何變遷,並分析司法實務判決的起訴、定罪、量刑情形,瞭解對幼年人性侵害犯罪於現行實務中的概況。 於對幼年人性侵害犯罪有一基本瞭解後,本文於第四章即探討對幼年人性侵害犯罪實體法上爭議,首先是現行刑法中,對幼年人性侵害犯罪法條論罪關係,並針對幼年人年齡與其意願於刑法上的評價作出分析和批評。再於第五章中探討對幼年人性侵害犯罪在程序法上,應如何評價幼年人證述之證據能力與證明力,並將我國鑑定制度與美國專家證人制度作一比較,以對我國鑑定制度提出建議。 經過上開研究、分析後,本文於結論中,試圖對現行法制在實體面與程序面均提出建議。實體面上,本文提出對幼年人性侵害犯罪刑法之修法建議,主要係主張對12歲以下幼年人為性交行為者,應論以對幼年人性交、猥褻罪,並加重刑度,且毋庸探討被害幼年人的意願,因其性發展階段尚未成熟,而無性自主權,故毋庸探討其意願,規範保護目的為幼年人之身心健全發展權利。程序面上,本文提出應建立一套適合幼年人的訊問程序,並應對我國現行鑑定制度作一修正。透過此實體面與程序面的建議,本文希冀能達到保護被害幼年人,並落實對幼年人性侵害犯罪的追訴、審判,以求能毋枉毋縱。

In August and September, 2010, two child sexual abuse cases were reported by the mass media and incurred admonishment and criticism from the public in Taiwan. One of the cases, that of a six-year-old child who was sexually assaulted, was heard by the Kaohsiung District Court in Taiwan. The Supreme Court of the Republic of China heard another case in which a three-year-old child was sexually abused. To determine whether the existing legal system needs to be amended, this study discusses the practice and the procedures of the trials involving child sexual abuse cases. The first part of this study demonstrates a basic analysis of child sexual abuse crimes to learn the crime trends, crime characteristics, and general misunderstandings of sexual assault. This study then further analyzes the evolution of criminal legislation of child sexual abuse in Taiwan; the protection of legal interest; the definition of “sexual intercourse”; and how criminals change their behavior according to the legal changes being discussed. To better understand the practice of child sexual abuse trails, the study also evaluates the suit conducted, the convictions, and the sentences of the trials. In chapter four, we discuss controversial issues in substantive criminal law; for example, how the existing criminal child sexual abuse law decides on the nature of guilt.

Furthermore, we analyze and criticize how the age of children and their desires are considered in the criminal law. Chapter five demonstrates how to evaluate the admissibility and the probative force of a child’s testimony in the procedural law. Also, we make a suggestion for the appraisal system in Taiwan by comparing it with the expert witness system in the US. In the conclusion, we provide suggestions for the practice and procedure dimensions of the existing legal system. In the practice dimension, we suggest that the child sexual abuse law should be amended. People who have sexual intercourse with children under age 12 should receive an aggravated penalty due to committing the crimes of sexual intercourse with, and indecent assaults against children. Because child victims are not fully sexually developed and autonomous, their desires do not need to be considered when deciding on the nature of guilt. The purpose of the protection norm is to make children mentally and physically well-developed. For the procedure dimension, we suggest that an appropriate interrogation process should be constructed for children and the appraisal system should be modified. By providing these suggestions, we expect the law to be better able to protect the child victims, and execute the prosecution and trials in a just manner.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/33444590159547460013

回頁首