中文摘要

研究目的在於以再犯率為治療成效評估基準，從社會控制理論探討已施行15年之性侵害強制治療實施的成效。本研究採文獻探討與次級資料調查分析方法，瞭解性侵害收容人的個人特質、強制治療執行紀錄與再犯情形。樣本蒐集係於台北、台中、高雄監獄提供該監於95年間期滿或假釋釋放（排除移監或死亡）性侵害罪收容人536名。研究結果為（一）目前的篩選機制無法辨別個案之危險性；（二）治療次數及治療時間的多寡與個案的再犯紀錄無顯著關係，但平均數值有所差異；（三）比較性犯罪與未再犯二組間的治療時間時，二組間差異達到顯著，即治療師在治療實施過程的判斷，產生影響。（四）目前使用的成效評估工具尚不足以反應個案再犯危險性；治療結果係表示個案是否完成治療，分析結果發現，不論是否完成治療，其再犯紀錄的表現未有顯著差異。在犯罪預防上要努力的方向並非僅針對犯罪人本身，更應加強其與社會控制機制的聯結及注意外在社區環境對犯罪機會的影響。對已出獄的性罪犯亦應加強獄中治療師與社區治療師的聯繫，維持縝密及連貫性的社區監控，定期長期性追蹤，加強社區安全維護措施，斷絕被害機會發生。

English Abstract

The purpose of the study is based upon the recidivism rate to examine the effectiveness of mandatory treatment for the male sexual offenders over the past 15 years using a social control theory perspective. This study employed literature review and secondary data analysis to investigate the characteristics, mandatory treatment records, and recidivism of the male sexual offenders. The collaborated study sites were Kaohsiung Prison, Taichung Prison, and Taipei Prison. At the year of 2006, 536 participants set off or are paroled from the prisons excluding those displaced to other prison or dead joined in this study. Descriptive statistics were conduct to characterize all characteristics. T-test and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare the variance in the reported six coping domains in the entire sample based on the participants' mandatory treatment and recidivism. The analyzed data reveals (1)the current evaluating mechanism doesn't tell the level of risky for the male sexual offender; (2)no significant difference between the number and length of mandatory treatment for the recidivism records; (3)the therapists have significant impact on valuating the durance of the treatment; (4)the effectiveness of mandatory treatment without significant relationship with the risky of recidivism. That is to say, mandatory treatment has no significant effect on the preventing recidivism. To prevent sexual recidivism, mandatory treatment is a passive approach on criminals. We should strengthen the social control and decrease the criminal opportunities in the community. For the released sexual offenders, the practitioners either providing treatment in the prison or in the community should keep comprehensive and continuous monitoring on them. Furthermore, we should solid the security facilities in the community to prevent the victim.

資料來源：https://goo.gl/Kp8748