● 中文摘要：

　　性自主意識的支配是修法後妨害性自主罪所保護的主要法益，文章中以該罪章所處罰的行爲與法益的侵害程度兩種不一樣的思考爲出發點，分別對該罪章製作出二種不一樣的犯罪類型的體系分析。在體系的交叉比較後，尤其在以法益保護爲主的思惟中，本文試圖以性自主權的當然侵害與性自主權的擬制侵害爲體系分析的上位槪念，而分別檢驗現有犯罪類型之規範妥當性。其次在妨害性自主權行爲的討論中，本文認爲在刑事立法政策的考量下，不應再將焦點置於現有槪念的闡釋，文章中以人類社會性觀念的變遷，探究性行爲之本質以及現有社會價値對性自主權之認識，並以現有社會價値的呈現，闡明刑法妨害性自主之行爲規範應有的表達。

● English Abstract:

     After amending the law, the main benefit from law in crime of interference with sex liberty has been protected by the domination of sex liberty. In this article, we mainly base on two different thoughts, punishment by this crime and inroads degree of benefit form law, to analyze two different systems of crime type made accordingly to this crime. After compared by systems，especially in the core of protection of benefit from law，we tried to examine standard propriety separately by two measures of proper inroads of sex liberty and the legal fictional inroads of sex liberty. After that, at the discussion of interference of sex liberty，we think, under the penal policy consideration, we should not concentrate to explain the existent thought. Therefore, we research the essence of sex behavior and the awareness of sex liberty in our society according to the change of human history and express a standard behavior of interference of sex liberty under penal law by existent value in our society.

● 文章連結：

https://goo.gl/4FnJAv

● 資料來源：

法源法律網