Since recently several years, the domestic abuse often has appeared in the news media. More and more domestic abuse cases repeatedly occurs. As if, "domestic abuse preventing and controlling law" appearance, certainly does not have the means to suppress the violence keeping pouring in. Therefore, actually Taiwan's society has had any question, is worth needing to discuss. This research through the above question, discuss supreme court judge and local court judge abuot " domestic abuse preventing and controlling law " the understanding. Whether like initially formulated the significance equally was for maintain the family to be harmonious. Further understood judge regarding this law, whether only can explain and the use on the wording significance, but creates the result actually and initially legislated the goal was different. This was a question which was worth discussing. Therefore, this research attempts to disscuss that whether judge’s sex, age, experience and period of service difference, creates judge in the different understanding of the law.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/84431712224909688448