中文摘要:

本研究旨在綜整縣市執行「簡易型處遇計畫」方案整合的經驗，並藉以探討網絡資源整合之模式與策略，以回饋家暴防治實務互為學習參考。研究文獻探討中針對家庭暴力中的加害人圖像、家庭暴力加害人處遇的現行狀況、家庭暴力加害人「簡易型處遇計畫」的網絡合作精神與模式三個部分進行整理回顧。本研究採質性研究方法，研究資料蒐集主要來自於六次的焦點團體訪談、一次的深度訪談為主。焦點團體訪談人數共50人，深度訪談人數有3人。
研究資料經分析後有下列四部分之發現，一、家庭暴力加害人簡易型處遇模式發展的價值與意義，二、實施簡易處遇方案所遇困境，三、實施簡易處遇方案之策進，四、簡易處遇方案網絡合作之策略。
透過這些發現得出下列之研究結論，一、家暴加害人處遇計畫裁定率之提高是實施簡易處遇方案非常重要的價值，二、簡易處遇方案是善用在地資源而因地制宜之家暴防治措施，三、法官在簡易處遇方案中具關鍵性影響力，四、家暴防治系統與家暴事件當事人因著實施簡易處遇方案而受益，五、網絡合作有賴邊做邊修，難一次到位。並且就實務工作者提出的建議有，一、課程融入CEDAW與性別平權概念，二、廣結地檢署資源，讓違反簡易處遇保護令之加害人至地檢署上課，三、合作團隊專業知能的提昇，四、應扶植更多的在地化資源以回應處遇實務所需，五、簡易處遇具執行價值，是值得著力的區塊。對未來研究的建議有一、對於接受過簡易處遇計畫加害人再犯率之研究，二、關於加害人對簡易處遇認知感受之研究，三、被害人對於簡易處遇方案認知看法之訪談研究，四、檢視縣市家暴防治工作中協助被害人與加害人資源分配之研究

English Abstract:

This study aims to sum up integration experiences of the cities and counties in implementing the ‘Simple Treatment Program’ (STP), as well as to investigate models and strategies of network resource coordination, in order to feedback as a learning reference for the practical prevention and control of domestic violence. Its exploration of research papers focuses on a review on three domains: the portrayal of perpetrator in domestic violence, the current intervention methods on the perpetrator in domestic violence, and the spirit and models of cooperative networking in STP for the perpetrator in domestic violence. The study adopted qualitative research methods. Data were mainly collected from six focus-group interviews and one in-depth interview. In total there were 50 participants in the focus-group interviews and 3 in the in-depth interview.
Data analysis came up with findings categorized in four parts: 1) the significance and meaning of the development of simple treatment model regarding the domestic violence perpetrator; 2) the difficulties in the implementation of STP; 3) the improvement of implementing STP; and 4) the strategies of cooperative networking in STP.
The following conclusions were drawn from these findings:
1) It is very important to increase the ruling rate on cases of domestic violence perpetrator treatment program in the implementation of STP;
2) STP is a measure that capitalizes on local resources and adapts to local conditions in the prevention and control of domestic violence;
3) The judge holds a key influence in the STP process;
4) The implementation of STP benefits both the domestic violence prevention system and the persons involved in domestic violence cases;
5) Cooperative networking relies on on-going amendments, instead of a one-off solution.
In addition, several suggestions were proposed to practitioners:
1) The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and gender equality concept should be integrated into the curriculum;
2) Resources should be widely compiled from District Prosecutors’ Offices and offenders of the STP orders should be enforced to attend lectures in the District Prosecutors’ Offices;
3) Efforts should be made to enhance professional knowledge and ability of the cooperative teams;
4) Support should be brought to more localized resources in response to the needs of the intervention practices;
5) STP has its implementing value and thus deserves more efforts to tackle.
Proposed subjects for future research include:
1) Research on the recommitting rate of perpetrators that have received STP;
2) A study of the perpetrator’s cognitive and emotional perception of simple intervention;
3) An interview study of victims on their perception of STP;
4) A review of resource distribution on victims and perpetrators regarding domestic violence prevention works in the cities and counties.

資料來源: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dtp9hv