● 中文摘要：

　　家庭暴力因涉及親密關係與情感、血緣與子女、經濟與財務，以及家庭宗族間複雜的多元議題，是以社會集體意識凝聚不易，加以家暴防治法上路以來，組織定位不明、網絡整合不易、缺乏個案危險評估與分級管理機制、網絡專業敏感度不足、服務輸送不足以回應被害人需求等問題，致使防治工作即便邁入第二個十年，依舊面臨諸多挑戰與困境。

　　本研究旨在探討安全防護網的衍生歷程，以及危險評估工具的發展與運用狀況，並採用績效評估方式，以台南市推動三年的經驗為例，透過分析組織層次的訓練、會議、行政支持與資源連結等執行情形，了解對於網絡及其成員在專業成長、網絡互動、組織與制度、服務操作的影響，同時，了解安全防護網對被害人的相關影響。

　　研究發現安全防護網的推動正向之處在於:1.有效提升網絡成員量表施測的普及率及精準度，2.促進網絡個案研討的效能，3.有助於網絡正向合作關係的穩定發展，4.間接影響相關政策的形成或體制的建立，5.因著即時頻繁與多元服務方式，有效提升被害人對暴力的因應能力；不過安全防護網的推動仍有不足之處，包括1.網絡成員對量表解讀與因應運用的知能不足，2.防治網絡在資源連結與資訊蒐集廣度仍待加強，3.面對不合作案主、精神疾患、自殺或智能不足等複雜個案的處遇仍顯有氣無力，4.加害人工作仍有賴警政及刑事司法的積極介入與整合性服務。

　　是以本研究建議後續推動安全網可以朝1.在危險評估機制建立基礎下，依個案危險程度，將工作人員區分為重案組、追輔組及教輔組，2.開發適用不同對象的危險評估量表，3.司法正視高壓控制的罪行，並積極參與網絡整合工作與跨機構會議，4.檢警應確實執行加害人違法約制行動，5.跨機構會議的分裂與轉型，同時建立縣市轉銜機制，6.辦理專業訓練應分級反覆教育，並且加重實務演練與角色扮演，7.開發加害人多元服務工作，8.建立相關標準作業與配套措施。至於未來研究，則建議加入統計數據的量化合併質化研究，考量脈絡分析的績效評估，以及跨縣市推動經驗比較。

● English Abstract:

     Since domestic violence is a complicated multiple issues that involves intimate relationship, affection, kinship, children, finance and clans, the collected consciousness is hard to be established. In addition, we are still confronting numerous challenges and difficulties, even though the implementation of Domestic Violence Prevention Act has come into its second decade, due to those problems of unclear organizational structure, uneasy integration of network, lack of danger assessment and risk management, insufficient professional sensibility and service to respond the victims’ need.
     The research, in using the example of Tainan City’s experience in promotion of Safety Protection Network Project (SPNP) for three years, is aimed to investigate the development and application of danger assessment tool of domestic violence and the evolvement of SPNP, as well as to understand its impact on aspects of professional growth, network interaction, structure and system, service operation and influences on victims. In applying outcome evaluation, the implementation of training courses, meetings, administration support, and resource connection in organization are analyzed.
     The findings of positive outcome of the SPNP are as followed. (1) The scale-using rate and accuracy rate is promoted among professionals in the network. (2) The efficacy of case discussion among network professionals is enhanced. (3) It is helpful in developing stable and positive network collaboration. (4) It shows indirect influence on policy making or system reforming. (5) It is efficient in empowering victims to respond to violence. Nevertheless, there are outcomes need to be improved. First, the knowledge of explanation and application of DA tool is insufficient among network professionals. Second, the span of data collection and resources connection should be enhanced. Third, in facing un-cooperated, psychiatric, suicide-intention and mentally retard clients, professionals still provided powerless strategies. Forth, intervention and integration of police and legal system for perpetrators is needed to be improved.
     Therefore, the research suggests the developing directions in promotion of SPNP. (1) Based on danger assessment, our service can be divided into high risk team, follow-up team and educational team in order to respond to the degrees of danger of the victims. (2) More client-adaptive assessment tool should be developed. (3)Legal system should recognize coercive control as a crime and actively participate in integrative network and multi-agency risk assessment conferences for very high-risk victims. (4) Prosecutors and police enforcement should seriously carry out legal enforcement acts to restrain perpetrators’ violation acts. (5) The split and transformation of multi-agency risk assessment conferences for very high-risk victims is necessary, and cross-country referral system should be established. (6) Professional training courses should be undergoing in form of different levels and repetition with reinforcing practical simulation or role play. (7) Multiple services for perpetrators should be provided. (8) Standard operation procedure and coordinated sets of methods should be established.
     As to future research directions, quantitative with statistics and qualitative research, outcome evaluation in consideration of context analysis and cross-country comparison of project experience are highly suggested.

● 文章連結：

https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m9abvq

● 資料來源：

臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統