● 中文摘要：

　　本研究以「家庭暴力加害人處遇成效意涵之研究」為題，主要目的是瞭解家暴加害人處遇介入系統中之處遇人員、加害人及受害人等，對處遇成效的主觀性認知，期能經由三方對成效的詮釋視角，提升處遇人員對家暴加害人處遇成效的敏感度，增進處遇責信的層次，並建構出適合家暴加害人處遇成效的評估模式。研究訪視對象為處遇人員11人，加害人7人，受害人6人，分別探討處遇人員對處遇成效之意涵、加害人參與處遇過程之反應覺察、受害人對加害人接受處遇之期待等三方向度的異同之處。研究以質性研究之紮根理論進行分析與理論建構，試圖瞭解處遇成效之關聯性，並建構出多元性的評估理論模式。

　　經研究分析發現，有關家暴加害人處遇成效的評估模式含括多項意涵。如下：

一、處遇人員態度影響處遇成效
當處遇人員以「夥伴平等關係型」介入處遇工作時，因處遇人員較傾向尊重案主自決、主客體相容、貼近案主、互惠學習，以及避免權控複製等態度，加害人對處遇方案有較高的接受度。相對的，如以「專業權威型」介入處遇工作時，處遇人員較以處遇關係階層化、專業性角度、政治立場操作，以及權威影響力的過度使用等，不僅未能提升加害人學習意願，甚而轉向對抗處遇人員，耗損了整體的處遇效果。

二、處遇成效行動模式之評估系統互為正向增強與消弱影響
(一)處遇人員如受到機構支持正向能量將會提升，惟如因機構支持度不佳，導致業務負荷過重、醫療階層化的剝削，塑造出非自願性的工作者時，將會消弱處遇成效。
(二)加害人部分，因非自願性案主的屬性，以及對家暴體制的不滿與司法怨懟，將會消弱處遇的效果。另因加害人自身的改變及成員的異質性等，會影響處遇成效評估偏誤的可能。
(三)司法系統對處遇成效的再犯認知及對加害人的法律性約束，不僅影響到處遇成效的良寙，也干擾了處遇成效評估的精確度。
(四)受害人因家暴所衍生的問題與受暴經驗之創傷，會造成受害人之間對處遇成效期待的差異性，加上仍與加害人同住，且因司法系統的介入，呈現出緊張狀態。此兩造的共變牽連關係，有時會產生消弱處遇效果。

三、改變模式之處遇人員與加害人對處遇成效之間距認知
家暴處遇方案的執行過程，直接或間接受到上述各系統影響，造成處遇人員對成效意涵與加害人對處遇反應覺察產生間距落差。如行動模式之各系統間，存有正向能量時，成效認知間距會逐漸達到一致性，惟如系統間互為消弱時，兩者成效認知間距會逐漸擴大，形成加害人以趨利避害的態度，敷衍整體處遇過程。

　　基於上述的研究發現，處遇人員態度要以提升加害人的動機為首要，故不僅尊重加害人的自決意志，且要時時以多元位置的思慮，以及避免複製父權的敏感度，並採協同合作取代專業性介入，進行家暴加害人處遇工作。也須考量加害人的個別差異性及需求，給予加、受害人有參與的機會，以設計適切的處遇方案達成責信的務實要求。

● English Abstract:

     The research of "A study on the implication of the domestic violence perpetrators treatment” is for the main purpose to understand the subjective cognition of the treatment of effectiveness by those who are in the intervention system of the domestic violence perpetrators treatment like the three sides of work staff, perpetrator and victim. That can be expected to enhance the sensitivity of the interpreted treatment of effectiveness, to increase the accountability level of treatment, and to build up a proper assessment model for domestic violence perpetrators treatment. The research visited 11 work staffs, 7 perpetrators, 6 victims, respectively discussed the work staffs’ implication of the treatment of effectiveness, the perpetrators perceived responses to the process, and the victims expectation for the perpetrators treatment to look forward to receiving the three degrees of similarities and differences direction. The research is by the qualitative research study with grounded theory analysis and theory construction, trying to understand the association of the treatment of effectiveness, and to construct the assessment theoretical model with diversity.
     The research found that there were a number of implications in the assessment model of the treatment of effectiveness as follows:

First, the attitude of work staffs affected the treatment of effectiveness. When work staffs intervened with "type of equal partners " during the treatment, they were more likely to respect the clients self-determination, subject and object compatibility, close to the client, mutual learning, and to avoid replication of right & control and so on, all these made perpetrators have a higher acceptance to the treatment. On the contrast, if work staffs intervened with the "type of professional authority" for the treatment, the intervention by the hierarchical relationship, professional point of view, political manipulation, and excessive use of authoritative influence, not only failed to improve perpetrators learning willingness, and even turn against the work staffs, the overall would consume the treatment of effectiveness.

Second, for the treatment of effectiveness, the action modes and the assessment system would be mutually positive reinforcement and weakened effectiveness.
(A) When work staffs were supported by the institution, the positive energy would increase, but when the institutional support was not good enough, it would result in business overloaded, hierarchical medical exploitation, the non-voluntary workers created, it would weaken the treatment of effectiveness.
(B) For perpetrators, due to non-voluntary client's property, dissatisfaction with the domestic violence system and the justice complaints, the treatment of effectiveness would be weakened. In addition, due to perpetrators self-change and their heterogeneity, etc., it would affect the assessment of treatment of effectiveness at the possibility of bias and mistakes.
(C) Justice system on the recidivism cognition of the treatment of effectiveness and the legal constraints of perpetrators, not only affected the effectiveness, but also interfered with the accuracy of the assessment.
(D) For victims, because of the problems arising from domestic violence and the trauma from battered experience, which would cause them to have the differences on the expectations of effectiveness, and they still lived with the perpetrators, and owing to the involvement of the judicial system, it was a tension condition. Both perpetrators and victims Implicated in such covariant relations, would sometimes weaken the effectiveness.

Third, the changed model for work staffs and the cognition distance of effectiveness for perpetrators.
The execution of the domestic violence treatment was directly or indirectly affected by the above systems, and would cause the distance differences between work staffs and perpetrators on the implication of effectiveness and the perceived responses. If the action modes of the systems were with positive energy, the cognition distance of effectiveness would gradually achieve consistency, but when systems weakened each other mutually, their cognition distance of effectiveness would gradually expand, and make the perpetrators with the attitude approaching profit and avoiding loss, half-hearted to the overall process of treatment.
According to the above findings, most importantly, work staffs should require their attitude to promote perpetrators motivation, not only to respect the will of perpetrator's self-determination, and to think all times by multiple positions to concern, and to avoid copying the sensitivity of paternity, and to adopt collaboration against professional intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence to proceed the treatment, but also need to consider the perpetrator's individual differences and needs and give perpetrators and victims opportunities to participate to design proper treatment programs to achieve accountability of the pragmatic requirements.

● 文章連結：

https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3cnw6c

● 資料來源：

臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統