● 中文摘要：

　　男性親密暴力有其變異性，因此實用有效的分類是理解其心理機制的重要基礎，不僅有助於相關議題的釐清，亦是規劃安全有效處遇方案的基石。但是目前較受關注的國內外分類架構皆因尚未考量華人關係主義與文化變遷的影響性，以致無法周延闡述台灣的親密暴力者。此一缺漏可能衍生出效果有限的介入方案，讓女性受暴者繼續置身暴力情境中；凸顯台灣迫切需要一套契合本土脈絡的分類架構。因此本研究擬從華人關係主義與文化變遷的適應觀點出發，以男性親密暴力者的經驗敘說為主體，佐以司法文件作為檢視與校正的素材，進行分類的建構。為達此目的，本研究在方法學上遵循建構主義典範，邀請24名男性接受半結構深度訪談，其中6人為某家暴專監的親密暴力收容人，另外18人為法院裁定社區親密暴力強制處遇之相對人，所得訪談文本再以共識質性研究法進行分析。研究結果顯示有五個可以區分受訪者差異的向度，包括男性本位的省思、酒精使用、對妻子的評價、親密關係的維繫、人格與臨床症狀；據此五個向度可將受訪者分成四個類型，包括自我調整型、避罰從法型、混亂再犯型、反擊型。本研究並針對各型施暴者的諮商研究與處遇進行討論。

● English Abstract:

     Male intimate partner violence varies across cases, so a practically and validly typological frame is essential for understanding the psychological mechanics and characteristics of male violence. In Taiwan, counselors were used to import western typological models to have effective counseling. However, many well-known western typologies were found to have deficiency in considerations related to Chinese traditional Relationalism within changing Taiwan society. These shortages may cause inefficiency in the batterers corrected counseling programs in Taiwan. This in turn directs the victim women into unaware risk of violence as they could be improperly convinced about her safety from the counseled batterers. From the above observations, there is an urgent need to construct a well-defined indigenous typology according to the male batterers’ narration with the context of Chinese Relationalism and changing Taiwan society. In addition, this study also underlined the considerations of male batterers’ crime diary, forensic documents, and court statements for checking as well as supplement. In order to approach this goal, this study was designed by following the constructivism paradigm and adopt consensual qualitative research (CQR) maneuver to analyze the text. Toward this, 24 interviewees were invited as interviewees for semi-structural in-depth interview, they all committed intimate partner violence and violated domestic law. The results indicated that the interviewees could be divided into four types according to five dimensions. The four types are as follows: Self-modification, Following-law, Distress, and Fighting-back. The five dimensions are as follows: Reflect related to patriarchy, Alcoholic usage, Criticism to partners, Maintenance of relationship, and Personality disorder and clinic symptoms. I also discussed the applications for future studies and counseling practice related to each type for intimate partner violence. 

● 文章連結：

https://goo.gl/C5nFqU

● 資料來源：

政府研究資訊系統