中文摘要：

殺人是否要判處死刑？我國刑法關於量刑之標準為刑法第57條所列各項，但往往我們看到的判決探討之因素都不只刑法第57條所規定之事項，最重要的，判決結果也似乎不是以刑法第57條為標準，到底法院之量刑因素除了刑法第57條以外還有哪些重要因素？本文探討2012至2019年矚目殺人案件，討論判決最終之依據為何？歸納出未判處死刑之因素有教化可能、精神疾病及被害人家屬之聲音等。
目前世界刑事政策之走向偏向不判處死刑，而有著死制度的台灣要如何順應世界潮流，在不判處死刑的前提下實現司法正義？這樣的判決是否能為人民所接受，是否會引起人民對司法的不信任？
法官量刑時除依刑法第57條逐項檢視，仍需憑藉鑑定團隊給予之專業意見下判決，本文雖將類型分為「有教化可能」、「精神疾病」及「被害家屬的聲音」三種，但說穿了這些類型都有鑑定意見的痕跡，可見鑑定意見在法院判決中所佔比例之重。
本文試圖以歸納這些殺人判決中所考量刑法第57條以外之因素，並對這些因素提出質疑，期能解開司法判決長久以來之黑盒子，藉此希望未來能脫掉司法不公這頂大帽子。

英文摘要：

Is there a death penalty for murder? The criteria for sentencing in my country’s Criminal Law are those listed in Article 57 of the Criminal Law, but we often see that the factors discussed in the judgment are not limited to the matters stipulated in Article 57 of the Criminal Law. Article is the standard. In addition to Article 57 of the Criminal Law, what other important factors are there in the court’s sentencing factors? This article discusses the high-profile homicide cases from 2012 to 2019. What is the basis for the final judgment? It can be concluded that the reasons for not being sentenced to death are the possibility of enlightenment, mental illness, and the voice of the victim’s family.
The current trend of the world's criminal policy is that the death penalty is not im-posed. How can Taiwan, with its death penalty, follow the trend of the world and achieve judicial justice without the death penalty? Can such a judgment be accepted by the people, and will it cause people to distrust the justice?
In addition to reviewing the sentence item by item in accordance with Article 57 of the Criminal Law, the judge still needs to rely on the professional opinions given by the appraisal team to make a judgment. Although this article divides the types into three types: " expectation of correction", "mental illness" and "voice of the victim's family." In fact, these types have traces of appraisal opinions, which shows that ap-praisal opinions account for the heaviest proportion of court judgments.
This article attempts to summarize the factors other than Article 57 of the Criminal Law considered in these homicide judgments, and to question these factors, hoping to unlock the long-standing black box of judicial judgments, and hope that the big label of judicial injustice can be removed in the future.

文章連結：

https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7248j6

資料來源：

臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統