中文摘要：

近年來，我國陸續出現數起震驚社會之隨機殺人案件，不僅造成無辜民眾死
傷，亦讓社會人心不安，種種跡象顯示，隨機殺人犯罪此種新興犯罪型態一旦發
生，總是對我國社會造成嚴重的傷害。另就我國司法信賴度長期低靡不振，法官
判決時常與民眾期待有所落差，特別是一些社會矚目之殺人案件判決，法官究竟
為何判生而非判處死刑，往往引起各界議論，甚至出現恐龍法官一詞，司法改革
箭在弦上。
針對隨機殺人犯罪，我國尚未訂立特別法。本文嘗試以判決分析法，就國內
隨機殺人案件之相關判決整理與分析，探討法官在面對這類案件形成心證作出判
決時，是否有其特別考量之量刑因素，試圖了解隨機殺人犯罪與一般殺人犯罪之
判決意旨究竟有無不同之處。
綜觀本文探討之六起隨機殺人案例判決，其與一般殺人案件審理程序似無不
同：參酌刑法第 19 條、依刑法第 57 條審酌一切情狀，而當被害者人數在兩位以
上時，才有可能是法官判處死刑之必要條件。從而，法官對於隨機殺人犯罪是否
判處死刑的正義觀，關鍵也許在於死亡人數，其他或許只是故作的幻影。
關鍵字：隨機殺人、死刑、量刑因素

英文摘要：

Recently, random killing cases occurred and shocked the masses in Taiwan, which not only led to the death and injury of innocent people but also frightened the masses. All signs show that this new crime pattern of the random killing harm the society seriously. In addition, the judicial credibility in Taiwan has been doubted by masses for a long time. Judges’ judgments are far below public expectations, especially in the homicide cases that have attracted attention in masses. Masses discuss about judges’ viewpoint, and some people even treat them as incompetent judges. For this reason, the judicial reform is urgent.
As for the random killing, we did not have specific law in dealing with this case so far. In the present study, the judgment analysis is applied in discussing and analyzing whether judges have special considerations in sentencing or not, trying to clarify the differences in judgments between random killing cases and other homicide cases.
For the six random killing cases in this study, the procedures of trials were quite similar to other homicide cases. In discussing necessary condition of sentencing, the death penalty may be sentenced when the number of victims is more than two. For this reason, it seems that the justice concept of judges would be dependent on the number of victims without other unrealistic claims.
Keywords：random killing, death penalty, sentencing.

文章連結：

https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2c25b5

資料來源：

臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統