按Enter到主內容區
:::

竊盜犯罪偵查之研究─以探討犯罪嫌疑為主

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:231
本研究重在竊盜犯罪偵查層面之犯罪嫌疑本質探討,分從文獻及實證探討。 在文獻方面,從竊盜之現象面、觀察面、推論面及偵查面予以探討。 在實證方面,其一為重大竊盜個案分析;另則為犯罪嫌疑問卷分析;前者係蒐集國內重大竊盜個案之相關資料,以個案研究法對犯罪型態、方法、地點、時間、嫌疑人背景做分析,並以犯罪嫌疑向度解釋;後者係蒐集竊盜實例,以具偵查經驗之刑事警察人員做問卷調查,並做犯罪嫌疑因素分析。 經綜合上述研究結果,認為結論如下: 壹、犯罪嫌疑應依偵查過程分別定義 本文依犯罪偵查過程,分為三類:一、直覺觀察式犯罪嫌疑;二、破綻發覺式犯罪嫌疑;三、事後追溯式犯罪嫌疑。 貳、犯罪嫌疑本質應為「積極型」與「消極型」 向來人們即有與事實違常、反常、異常等認知上之矛盾,此矛盾係指與正常不同之違常、反常、異常而言。而將正常、反常現象等比對發現,以犯罪嫌疑程度差別表示,區分為「積極型」與「消極型」。 是故犯罪嫌疑本質不外乎「積極型」與「消極型」的發覺與運用,其中「積極型」係指積極表現超乎常情常理之作為者,「消極型」係指消極退縮不符常情常理之作為者。 依犯罪要素「人、事、時、地、物」等種種行為表現,配合運用「積極型」與「消極型」的概念,可較清楚犯罪嫌疑所在。 一、「人」的犯罪嫌疑:精神狀態、行為方式、言語表現、社經地位。 二、「事」的犯罪嫌疑:重罪案偽裝成竊盜所致之犯罪、竊盜案偽裝成無犯罪、竊盜案偽裝成輕於竊盜之犯罪。 三、「時」的犯罪嫌疑:隱密時間、過於定時、時間差異、個人作息、糢糊之不在場證明、完美之不在場證明。 四、「地」的犯罪嫌疑:隱密地點、偏僻地點、特殊地點。 五、「物」的犯罪嫌疑:數量過多、用途不符、痕跡顯現、來源追溯。

The purpose of this study will focus on the nature of the burglary from the perspectives of the criminal investigation. It is discussed in theory and in practice. Theoretically, the burglary is evaluated and predicted through observing the phenomenon and the investigation. Practically, major burglary samples were analyzed, and questionnaires were made. Samples of the burglaries were selected from major cases happened in this country, and were further analyzed by the type, means, place, time, and background of the suspects. Questionnaires containing burglary cases were shown to and answered by the experienced senior criminal investigators. Through the above research, it is concluded that: 1.The alleged crime types should be defined by the process of the criminal investigation and divided into: (1)pre-crime: intuition observation. (2) in the crime : to discover weak point. (3) after the crime: to retrace behind crime conduct. 2.The nature of alleged crime are divided into "active form "and "negative form". People have the instinct to perceive the abnormality of things that contradicts to our ways of thinking. To compare the normality with the abnormality, we may distinguish "active form "from "negative form" through the difference of the alleged crimes. In view of the above, it would be easier to unveil the allegedly crimes by practicing the concept of "active form "and "negative form"and by tracing their behavioral factors including WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE and WHICH. 1.WHO: to include the mental status, behavior, expression and social status. 2.WHAT: to include heavy crime becomes light one or nothing , light crime becomes nothing. 3.WHEN: to include confidential time, time difference, personal living habit, vague alibi and perfect alibi. 4.WHERE: to include confidential, remote and special locations. 5.WHICH: to include too much amount, not accordant function, obvious script, looking for source.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/39786132027040107277

回頁首