竊盜犯罪收容人在監適應情形之研究-以法務部矯正署泰源技能訓練所為例The research of the adaption to prison of the inmates against Offenses of Larceny-taking Taiyuan Skill Training Institute, Agency of Correction, Ministry of Justice for example.
竊盜犯罪一直以來是全國刑案發生率最高的犯罪類型，對社會大眾容易造成內心的恐懼感及生活上的不安全感。竊盜犯罪行為者一向有極高的累再犯率，因此，其在監的適應情形亟為吾人所欲探討。本研究目的旨在透過對法務部矯正署泰源技能訓練所竊盜犯罪收容人及各級管教人員之訪談，以瞭解觸犯竊盜犯罪收容人在監服刑期間之適應情形，期能作為以後各矯正機關在矯治上之參考。
本研究採用質性研究，以竊盜犯罪收容人9人及各級管教人員4人為研究對象，透過深度訪談法的方式蒐集現場訪談資料，並運用文獻分析法及次級資料加以歸納整理分析。經由研究分析結果主要結論如下：
竊盜犯罪收容人自我控制力低，有合理化本身行為技巧，平日善於做表面工夫，好逸惡勞追求享樂的性情；面對的壓力部分有對陌生環境所產生的壓力、愧對家人的壓力及面對未來的壓力等。另家庭的支持對竊盜犯罪收容人在監適應有正面之助益，反之，社會支持並沒對他們有幫助。在管教制度方面；他們都能適應工場的生活管理方式，對寬嚴並濟的管教方式比較能適應，面對配業方式適應良好，大都認為矯正機構的管理還算合理且透明。
在教化處遇方面，對教化課程安排評價不一，選擇性的參與教化活動接受度較高，且較為關心假釋制度，而監內的教化措施對他們幫助有限。在作業方面，竊盜犯罪收容人均能適應工場目前的作業課程，對作業問題無法諮詢及作業課程不一所造成作業不公情形感到不平，認為監獄的作業對於將來出監後並無助益，且技能訓練取得證照對未來謀職助期益不大。在衛生醫療方面，認為牙科診次太少而且對監內醫師看診態度不甚滿意，在緊急外醫制度方面時機不夠明確。在生活適應方面，大部分竊盜犯罪收容人均能適應各項生活管理方式，在遇到生活上的困難時均會向主管尋求協助，年紀稍長的竊盜犯罪收容人難以融入其他收容人的生活，舍房內擁擠與悶熱、舍房內禁止清洗衣服造成無可替換之衣物都會造成生活上難以適應之情形。
研究者依據受訪者的認知，研究分析結果歸納出結論後提出建議事項，希望將來能夠提供學術單位文獻參考或矯正單位在管理竊盜犯罪收容人時之參考運用。In all types of criminal cases in the country, up until now, there is the highest incidence of the offenses of larceny, which is likely to cause fear and the sense of insecurity with life to the public. There is always extremely high recidivism rate of the offenses of larceny actors. Therefore, we want to discuss with their adaption to prison. The purpose of this research was to understand the adaption to prison of the inmates, who violated the offenses of larceny and were serving the sentence, through the interviews with the inmates and controllers at all levels in Taiyuan Skill Training Institute, Agency of Correction, Ministry of Justice, and we hoped to take the results of research as references to agencies of corrections.
This research was conducted via qualitative research, regarding nine inmates of the offenses of larceny and four controllers at all levels as studies. The interview data were collected via in-depth interview, and generalized via document analysis and secondary qualitative study. The results were as followed:
The inmates against Offenses of Larceny had low self-control, were able to rationalize their bad behaviors, and they were mostly indolent fence riders. They had pressures of strange environment, future, and shame on family. The supports from families were positive about that the inmates adapted to the prison. Otherwise, the supports from society didn’t help at all. In terms of the correctional system, they had good adaption to the life management and assignments in workshops. They were more adapted to temper justice with mercy, and thought that the management were reasonable and transparent.
In terms of the enlightenment intervention, the inmates had different evaluations from the enlightenment courses. Selectively participating in the enlightenment activities was highly accepted. They focused on parole system, and the enlightenment in prison didn’t work much. In the aspect of labor operations, the inmates were adapted to their assignments in the workshops. Nonetheless, they felt it unfair about that they were not able to seek advice from controllers and different assignments were distributed with, which caused unfairness.
In their opinions, the labor operations in prison didn’t help at all after they leave. The certificate through skill training were not helpful when seeking for their jobs either. In hygienic and medical treatment, as for the inmates, the consultation times were few, and they were not satisfied with the doctors’ attitudes. The timing of emergent medical treatment to the hospital was not specific. Most of them were adapted to the livelihood management. They asked for help with controllers when there were problems. However, the older inmates could hardly blend in with other inmates. On the other side, the inmates couldn’t wash their clothes in the wards and therefore couldn’t change their clothes. It caused difficulties in livelihood, and so did the crowded and sultry surroundings in the wards.
According to the cognition with the interviewees, the conclusion was analyzed and generalized from the results of the research. We hope to provide with the research for academic institutions to refer as, and for correction agencies when managing the inmates against the offenses of larceny.
