按Enter到主內容區
:::

論證券詐欺之刑事責任⎯以我國司法實務為中心

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:249
本論文係針對證券詐欺刑事責任之現行法規範及司法實務見解探究及評析,並就現行缺失提出批判及調整意見與未來修法建議。即對於現行法之解釋適用、司法實務運作、立法論上等各種層面做出本罪的全盤研究。在論文架構上,第一章緒論為研究動機、目的、方法、範圍之介紹;第二章針對證券詐欺之定義及保護法益進行探討,奠定研究基礎;第三章係對證券詐欺之明文客觀構成要件逐一詳加研究,以了解法規範內容及實務運作之利弊得失,提出修正建議及方向;第四章則對於證券詐欺之主觀要件、犯罪性質、資訊重大性等部分分析、評價,並就不妥之處提出糾正意見;第五章為結論。 現行法之解釋及適用上,本文扣緊證券詐欺本身意涵、保護法益、立法目的、刑法之原理原則等觀點提出本文認為之妥適規範。司法實務之探討上,本文整理大量裁判並分析其內容,並表達出肯定或批評之見及如何改進之建議。未來修法建議上,本文在評析現行法規範之缺失、實務、學說見解後,提出本文之修正建議,以使證券詐欺相關法規範更加完備及明確。

In this thesis,I explore the existing legal norms and judical practice and legislation of criminal ciabilities of securities fraud, criticize on the existing deletion and propose adjusting recommendations. In chapters 1, I propose the investigative motive, purpose, method, and scope. In chapters 2, I explore definition and legal interests of protection of securities fraud. In chapters 3, I study objective constitutive elements of securities fraud comprehensively, and indicate the amendments. In chapters 4, I analyze the subjective elements, criminal nature, and information materiality. Then I correct the error. In chapters 5, I make the conclusion. In the interpretation and application of existing law, I propose the great legal norms in accordance with the meaning of securities fraud, legal interests of protection, purpose of the legislation,and the principle of criminal law. Researching on the judical practice, I have collected a lot of judgments and analyze its contents. Then I express my opinion. In adjusting recommendations of law, I propose my opinion after that I analyze deletion of existing legal norms, judical practice,and theory.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/39752653660843114990

回頁首