中文摘要:

由於高科技的快速發展與全球化的影響，犯罪行為已非侷限於單一國家內，加上網際網路、電信及金融科技的發展，犯罪型態不斷推陳出新，犯罪手法與技術更不斷精進，犯罪已逐漸演變成專業化、組織化、多元化及國際化的「跨境犯罪」模式，跨境詐欺犯罪已是兩岸及各國治安上極大隱憂。本研究係在分析探討兩岸合作打擊跨境詐欺犯罪現況，瞭解影響兩岸合作打擊跨境詐欺犯罪因素，據以研議治理兩岸跨境詐欺犯罪策略及合作方向，提供相關部門實務運作之參考。
本研究認為跨境詐欺犯罪的演變與發展及兩岸偵查犯罪制度等因素，均會影響兩岸合作打擊跨境詐欺犯罪政策之制定，而政策的指導造就成效，成效的良窳，將回饋作為政策的修正與合作策略的調整。故本研究係以兩岸合作打擊跨境詐欺犯罪的背景分析、合作機制及策略調整與展望等三個面向，編制深度訪談問卷，透過質化訪談曾實際參與兩岸合作打擊跨境詐欺犯罪之警察人員共計12人，藉以深度瞭解兩岸共同打擊跨境詐欺犯罪之現況，並驗證本研究之假設。
最後，透過實證研究及案例分析，本研究根據全球治理及司法互助等觀點提出「應以全球治理觀點檢視跨境詐欺犯罪」、「合作打擊跨境詐欺犯罪政策有待提升」、「偵查制度差異應再溝通協調」及「合作打擊犯罪機制有待改善」等四項應行檢討事項。最後，依據應行檢討事項，提出「擴大警務交流、縮小偵查差異，提升互信共識」、「加強人員培訓、舉辦犯罪研討，提升偵查智能」、「擴展合作範圍、開展多元管道，形成合作網絡」、「設立專責機構、適時給予獎勵，提升偵查意願」、「強化合作機制、建構犯罪平臺，合作打擊犯罪」及「互設交流辦事務、派駐警察聯絡官，強化合作效率」等六項可行建議。

英文摘要:

Due to the influence of developing technology and globalization, the act of crime does not limit itself in one single country these days. Furthermore, the forms and sophistications of crime have varied with the ever changing environment in the field of finance, internet and telecommunication. The committing of crime is now cross bordered and has evolved itself into professional, organizational and multidimensional. It is now the vast concern for many countries and Taiwan is no exception. This research thus intends to analyze the current situation and tries to reveal the elements that decide the cross strait co-operations in fighting against fraud between Taiwan and China. All in all, the research aims to come up with methods and strategies for the reference of law departments in cracking down cross border fraud.
This research considers that the evolution of cross border crime of fraud and the institution of cross strait co-operation on crime together decide－﹥contribute to the formation of current policy in fighting against fraud. Since policy is the key element to its end result, the modification of existing policy and co-operation should be based upon its execution. In order to analyze the background and the mechanism of co-operation and follow the modification of cooperating strategy, this research conducts in-depth questionnaires and interviews with 12 police officers that－﹥who actually worked in the field of cross strait co-operation in fighting against fraud. With the method of qualitative interviews, this research is then able to investigate the current situation and testify its hypothesis.
Based on the concepts of mutual aid regarding global governance and justice, this research brings up four agendas to examine. First of all, cross border crime of fraud should be examined on a global basis. Second, the co-operation in fighting against cross border crime of fraud still leaves a lot of room to improve. Third, the difference of investigation between Taiwan and China requires further communication and coordination. Finally, the mechanism of co-operation in fighting against fraud needs further upgrade. We therefore propose 6 suggestions for the current institutions to consider: 1.Broaden the inter-communications of police, nail down the difference of investigations to improve mutual understanding and trust.2.Reinforce educational trainings and discussions on criminal acts.3.Enrich the subjects of co-operations and develop channels of communication.4.Set up specific institutions to reward or punish the co-operation, which should then motivate the investigation of cross border fraud.5.Develop and share database of criminals and use it as a platform for investigation.6.Assign exclusive institutions and police officers to be in charge of mutual co-operation so that the investigations can be more effective.

資料來源: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s6gwka