中文摘要：

假性財產犯罪案件因佔地檢署收案量多數，法務部為解決民事事件債權人誤用刑事程序實現債權所造成之檢察機關負荷，而訂頒「法務部所屬各檢察機關處理假性財產犯罪案件改進方案」，以簡化此類案件處理程序之實施方式及臚列認定為假性財產犯罪案件之參考標準。又依現行實務作法，此類案件普遍為檢察事務官襄助處理之例行性事務，惟檢察事務官人力與檢察官人力比例懸殊，是否能達到案件簡化、迅速之成效，仍有疑慮。再者，此類案件偵查結果多為不起訴處分，乃因其本質屬於與私權有關之民事糾葛，被害人原應循求民事訴訟途徑解決紛爭，卻捨民事而以刑事討債。因該類案件涉及財產損害，被害人亦可選擇採取刑事訴訟程序維護權利，且因現行刑事訴訟制度對於提出告訴之要件並未設限，提出方式亦未限制，因此於債務不履行之情形，被害人多以提出詐欺罪告訴為之，此為本研究欲探討的主題。
本研究之目的要探討假性財產犯罪案件充斥地檢署原因，首先蒐集、整理、分析與財產犯罪之內涵及詐欺罪之構成要件相關之文獻作為本研究發展理論架構之基礎。再以近期實務所做偵查案件統計資料及法院對於上開方案附件所示案例之判決結果，檢視案件收結情形及判決無罪原因，以探討上開方案附件之不起訴理由是否妥適、是否可作為認定假性財產犯罪案件之參考標準，並就實務處理與私權糾紛有關之詐欺案件可行之做法提出建議，以改善目前實務假性財產案件佔收案量之冠情形。

英文摘要：

False property crimes are the majority of cases at Taiwan’s District Prosecutors Offices. As a result, in order to ease the load on the Prosecutors Office for solving creditors’ misuse of legal criminal procedures to realize civil claims, the Ministry of Justice has launched the “Improvement Act for handling false property criminal cases at prosecuting offices of the Ministry of Justice”, so as to simplify the processing implications of such cases and to set referencing standards of identification of false property crimes. At the same time, cases are trialed according to current existing practices. Such cases are generally processed with the aid of prosecutor investigators, but due to the discrepancy number of prosecutor investigators and that of prosecutors, the speed of cases simplification and whether such cases can be successfully simplified remains doubtful. Moreover, the investigation results of such cases are mostly not to be prosecuted. However, due to the nature of such cases belong to that of civil disputes of private property rights, victims should have chosen to resolve disputes via civil procedures, but instead of which, they have chosen to collect such claims through criminal proceedings. As such cases involve property damages, the victims can also choose to protect their rights through criminal procedures, there are no restrictions on the requirements of the current existing criminal proceeding system and the presentation. As a result, if debts are not realized, most victims would choose to raise legal claims of fraudulent, which is the topics to be explored in this study.
This study aims to explore the reasons behind the domination of false property crimes in Taiwan’s District Prosecutors Offices. Firstly, literature regarding property crimes and the constitutional requirements of frauds are collected and analyzed as basis for the development of framework. Then, data regarding recently investigated cases and results of prosecution of such cases are examined based on the appropriateness of such prosecutions, and whether such cases can act as the referencing standards for the identification of false property crimes. Suggestions will also be made on the practical implication of processing fraudulent cases related to disputes of private rights, so as to improve the current overload of false property cases in Prosecutors Offices.

資料來源：

台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統