中文摘要：

在全球化的現在，因應變化快速的社會、文化、環保、人權等議題，軟法治理的範圍不再僅限於環境保護、金融貿易等特定因素而制定軟法文件中之最低標準規範或共同承認的一般性原則，在人權條約之落實，軟法治理亦是目前的趨勢，透過區域性組織或聯合國大會召開相關議題之會議所制定相關軟法文件，提供各國行政、立法、司法之相關制度之技術建議，透過定期的資訊揭露或藉由各國間的共同影響，為目前軟法治理中重要之一環。
本文從非行少年之權利保障為探討主軸，從《北京規則》擴大非行少年之適用範圍，有權審理非行少年事件機關不再僅是以司法制度，而包括依法有權責之機關；《利雅得準則》則以非行少年並非身分犯之概念，以行政先行與非行預防落實國家親權與少年最佳利益的重要性；保護被剝奪自由少年準則則是以受到拘束的少年，在矯正機構內必須符合之最低標準。以上三個準則與《兒權公約》中對於非行少年之司法模式與福利模式相關的條文定義卻又不盡相同，因此本文以非行少年之權利保障為初步之概念釐清，並且與條約機構、國家人權委員會間的人權軟法治理與人權保障的進一步落實的相互影響，讓非行少年的權利保障更為完整。
我國在2014年5月20日公布兒童權利公約施行法，同年11月20日施行，為我國兒童人權新的里程碑。不過非行少年相關權益保障仍有許多不足之處，本文以少年事件處理法第3條2款中少年虞犯非行事件相關規定，從司法謙抑原則、虞犯非行採行政先行、矯正機構採多元矯正模式等面向討論我國目前制度上的缺失，並提出相關解決方式。

英文摘要：

In the present of globalization, In response to rapidly changing issues of society, culture, environmental protection, and human rights, the scope of soft law governance is no longer confined to specific factors such as environmental protection, financial trade, etc., But the minimum standards or general recognition of the general principles in the implementation of human rights conventions and the governance of soft law are also the current trends. Through relevant conferences organized by regional organizations or the General Assembly of the United Nations, relevant soft law documents have been formulated to provide relevant systems for administration, legislation, and justice in various countries. Technical advice, through periodic disclosure of information or through common influence among countries, is an important part of the current implementation of softness.
In this thesis majorly discusses the protection of the rights of juveniles, Discusses its main principles, expands the scope of application of juveniles from the Beijing Rules, and had jurisdiction over the subject matter that juvenile delinquents are no longer based solely on the judiciary, but include organs that are legally entitled; the Riyadh guidelines are Affluent youth is not a concept of identity crime. The importance of administrative advancement and non-proceeding in the implementation of the country’s parental rights and juvenile best interests is important. The protection of deprivation of liberty youth guidelines is a minimum standard that must be met in a correctional institution. . The above three criteria are not the same as the definitions of the relevant provisions of the Child Rights Convention concerning the juvenile justice model and the welfare model. Therefore, In this thesis clarifies the concept of the protection of the rights of juvenile offenders and discusses with the treaty bodies and the National Human Rights Commission. The mutual influence of the implementation of the human rights soft law governance and the further implementation of human rights protection will ensure the integrity of the rights of the non-community juveniles.
Legislative Yuan, Republic of China (TAIWAN) has Announced the Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on May 20, 2014 and implemented it on November 20 of the same year. It is a new milestone for the human rights of children in our country. However, there are still many deficiencies in the protection of rights and interests of non-benefit juveniles. This article discusses the current institutional deficiencies of Republic of China (TAIWAN) juvenile delinquency law, Not Only From the principles of judicial humility, smuggling of administrative stipulations, and correctional institutions adopting multiple correction models, Also discuss the current lack of institutions of Republic of China (TAIWAN) and propose some relevant solutions.

文章連結：

https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0017-0907201818502900&sourceBrowseType=F

資料來源：

華藝線上圖書館