中文摘要：

近年來，霸凌在我國已逐漸形成嚴重的教育問題。但對於霸凌處遇的相關問題，卻相當少見於司法界的討論中。本文擬從少年司法的角度切入，就霸凌的概念、成因與現行的處遇對策做簡單介紹後，討論少年司法在霸凌處遇中的機能，並以此連結霸凌事件中少年司法與教育體系之處遇，讓少年司法得以在霸凌事件中，扮演更為積極的角色。考量到我國霸凌研究起步較晚，本文在前半段會先參考鄰國日本的霸凌研究成果。透過比較我國與日本的霸凌現象，先行釐清霸凌的相關概念後，在後半段針對霸凌在少年司法中的意義，以及少年司法在處理霸凌事件中如何因應霸凌事件的特性進行調整來加以檢討。
第二、三章中，本文首先針對霸凌的相關概念進行介紹。首先，從日本對於霸凌構造的研究中，可看見霸凌是一種具有傷害性的互動結構，且霸凌的意義會隨著政策的內容而有所調整。在現行的霸凌對策下，本文將我國與日本的霸凌對策區分為懲戒、規範內化與修復式處遇三種類型，並從處遇的成效、對少年的成長之影響等因素分析後，認為現行霸凌處遇中的修復式處遇是一種相對較好的處遇策略。同時，本文也認為若要更全面地推動修復式處遇，有必要考量將少年司法納入霸凌處遇的一環。
而在第四章中，本文透過社會系統論中「結構耦合」的理論，描繪出少年司法與教育系統在霸凌處遇中相互合作進行霸凌處遇的方式。並在檢視少年司法的立法目的後，重新將少年司法在霸凌處遇中的角色定位於「修復少年周邊關係」。延續此一脈絡，在第五章中，本文認為現行少年司法與教育體系的分工基準需要考量到「機能最適性」，進而分配彼此在霸凌程序中的修復機能。而在少年司法的實務運作中，於調查、審理階段均應在修復式處遇的基礎上，與教育體系進行合作，以使霸凌事件得以受到更為全面的處理。

英文摘要：

In recent years, campus bullying has become a serious educational problem in Taiwan. However, the issues about bullying are very few in the discussion of judicial scholars .So, this thesis would like to examine bullying issues from a juvenile justice perspective.
At first, this thesis will introduce the meaning of bullying ,and then take a look at its risk factors and the anti-bullying policy in Japan and Taiwan. Then, this thesis will examine the function of juvenile justice in anti-bullying policy ,and try to connect the education and judicial system in anti-bullying works. By this way, we can make juvenile justice system play a more positive role in anti-bullying works.
In consider at the anti-bullying research in Taiwan is still very young. In the former half of the thesis, it conferences the anti-bullying research resource in Japan in order to make the conception of bullying more clearly. And then, in the latter half, the thesis will focus on cases abuot bullying in juvenile justice. Focus on how to define bullying in juvenile law, and how to take a process for cases which is about bullying.
In chapter 2 and chapter 3, the thesis introduces the concept about bullying. First, from the research about construction of bullying in Japan, we can realize that bullying is a harmful relationship between students. However, the concept of bullying is not changeless, it changed due to the government’s policy.
And then ,the thesis separate the anti-bullying policy in Taiwan and Japan into three kinds, which include penalty, Discipline and Restorative Justice. By the analysis of the effect of policy, and the affect to growth of juvenile ,the thesis consider that the Restorative Justice policy may be the best choice of bullying policy. And if we would like to make Restorative Justice policy more useful in anti-bullying works, we shall let juvenile justice system play a more positive role in anti-bullying works.
In chapter 4, the thesis uses the concepts in Niklas Luhmann’s social system theory to describe the cooperation of juvenile justice system and education system as ‘structural coupling’. With analyzing the purpose of juvenile law ,it describe the juvenile justice system as a role to ‘restore the relationship between juvenile delinquent and people around him’. According to this ,the division between juvenile justice system and education system shall consider the effective restoration of bullying relationship.
Therefore, in the process of juvenile justice, the juvenile court must take the restoration of bullying into consider ,and cooperate with education system to make sure the juvenile court can cope with bullying case more appropriately.

文章連結：

https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0001-1407202001372200&sourceBrowseType=F

資料來源：

華藝線上圖書館