中文摘要:

本研究主要目的是瞭解殯葬業違法問題樣態與成因。在台灣，因此議題尚未被研究過，故本研究自我定位為探索性研究。研究以深度訪談方式，訪問了八名曾經親身處理親人後事之民眾，並以滾雪球方式，訪談四位業者，以及五位政府相關人員，如警察、議員、官員、公務員等。經過整理、分析訪談資料後，本研究發現殯葬業者共有十一種可能的違法或在法律邊緣的行為，前者樣態包括七種：二手花詐欺問題、醫院與業者綁標問題、業者協助濫開死亡證明問題、殯儀館與殯葬業者收取紅包問題、業者與警消單位的「互助關係」、業者未遵照契約內容處理無家屬之民眾或榮民後事、違法燃燒庫錢問題；後者共有四類：業者逃避生前契約規範問題、大型醫院與業者的「聯合服務」問題、業者與民間救護車合而為一問題，以及警方、養老中心與業者的「共存關係」。造成殯葬業違法行為的共犯結構包括醫生、民間救護車、醫院、安養中心、榮家、警察、119值勤人員殯儀館工作人員、花店與家屬。本研究認為被害者促發、業者違法次文化、厚葬文化、未遵守市場供需法則、行業無規範可以用來解釋殯葬業及其共犯結構形成的因素。本文最後也提出改善殯葬業違法問題之建議。

英文摘要:

The present research was designed to explore the crime and its social/cultural constructions in funeral business. It also attempted to explain how the crime network was built up in the business. By using the snowball sampling method, the research interviewed 8 people who have taken care of their family members' funeral matters, 4 funeral workers/employers and 5 related public servants to discover the possible crime networking in funeral business. There were 11 types of crime can be found in the funeral business. A tentative analytical framework was proposed to explain the crime networking in the funeral business: victim-facilitated theory, criminal subculture, traditional culture of ”last-treat to the death”, outbalance of supply and demand market principle, and anomie. Suggestions to rule and regulate the business were also be made at the end of the research.

資料來源: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=a0000189-200506-8-1-1-23-a