中文摘要

隨著全球化成型，對於抗制犯罪，均不能置身無世外。過去一年來，恐怖攻擊不斷，臺灣雖然未發生過任何恐怖攻擊，仍須與世界各國採取一致的規範。我國曾制定「反恐怖行動法草案」，仍未獲國會通過。2016 年 7 月 27 日為防止並遏止對恐怖活動、組織、份子之資助行為，維護國家安全，保障基本人權，強化資恐防制國際合作，特制定資恐防制法。然而，我國對於反恐作為，相較於世界各國的規範，仍嫌不足。歐盟堪稱有史以來，區域整合的典範，其中，以 2014 年 4 月 3 日通過了《歐盟刑事偵查令狀指令》，最具有跨時代的意義，除了有先進的立法技術，對於解決「跨境偵查」的具體規範，可作為世界各國的參考。此外，我國長久以來繼受德國法制，也可以觀察德國將歐盟指令轉化成?國法的過程，如何調和國際規範與內國法的差異，可作為我國未來在轉化反恐國際公約的參考，並且在其經驗，避免可能的問題，並健全我國未來反恐法制。

English Abstract

With the globalization of molding, for the fight against crime, can not be exposed to the world. Over the past year, terrorist attacks have continued, although Taiwan has not had any terrorist attacks, still need to be consistent with the norms of the world. China has enacted the draft Anti-Terrorism Act, which has not yet been passed by Congress. July 27, 2016 to prevent and curb terrorist acts, organizations, the financing of the organization, the maintenance of national security, the protection of basic human rights, strengthen international cooperation in the prevention and control of terrorism, the special system of fear of terrorism prevention and control law. However, China' s anti-terrorism as, compared to the norms of the world, still inadequate. The EU is a model of regional integration, with the adoption of the European Criminal Investigation Instructions Directive on April 3, 2014, the most trans-era significance, in addition to advanced legislative techniques, to solve the "cross-border Investigation" of the specific norms, can be used as a reference for countries around the world. In addition, China has long been following the German legal system, but also can observe Germany will be the EU directive into the process of domestic law, how to reconcile the differences between international norms and internal law can be used as a future in the transformation of anti-terrorism international conventions, Its experience, to avoid possible problems, and improve China's future anti-terrorism legal system.

資料來源：https://goo.gl/b8yvy8