受刑人假釋制度平等性之保障-以假釋審查機制之裁量權為核心
- 發布日期:
- 最後更新日期:109-05-13
- 資料點閱次數:145
In the history of Taiwan's Prison, this was the first such incident at Kaohsiung Prison which six inmates held their warden on February 11, 2015. It shook all people in Taiwan and hit the international headlines. It's beyond expression to value parole form , requirement ,and review mechanism for inmates. This motivation of study focuses on the unfair factors in parole review mechanism. Therefore, does that get the most out of its discrimination, fairness, and objectivity of parole system according to the equal protection, the first trial made by the Parole Board and the case review made by the Ministry of Justice. In the recent years, the approbation ratio of Taiwan's parole has been about 80%. Why do they feel unfair with the high approbation ratio? The interaction among this perceived-severity, regulations and laws, and practice is the expectation of the parole system for inmates. This paper is to discuss the equal protection of inmates parole review mechanism. Recently, inmates' right has been run high. Parole system results in punishment to prevent thought, in addition to encouraging inmates to repent and start anew, including prison management and stabilizing the inmates. Does it play a role in carrot and stick? Or is it a mutual game between the former and the latter on the Probationary Release of Death Convicts written by Ouyang Xiu? Now, the issue of estimate of the criminal policy is how to promote the equality of parole system and to make the decision of review institution standardize and clarify by S.O.P. This paper based on the conclusion of my study and to provide some suggestions in brief.
資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/02414439311937165468