按Enter到主內容區
:::

不同刑期受刑人對累進處遇、縮刑、假釋制度的認知及其對違規行為之影響

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:131
近年來全球的刑事政策走向重刑化的方向,監所超額收容造成人滿為患,管理人員與受刑人的比例失衡,監所人犯違規事件層出不窮,違規事件的出現不僅嚴重影響監所囚情穩定,也會增加管教人員的值勤風險與工作壓力,所以此一議題為矯正機構不可忽視的重要部分。影響違規的因素眾多,但有關行政模式下的累進處遇、縮刑與假釋制度對違規影響性之研究卻無許多著墨,而上述這些制度又會隨受刑人的宣告刑期之不同,導致相關處遇與晉級分數上的差異,因此本研究將探討長短不同刑期之受刑人在累進、縮刑與假釋制度的相關處遇與分數差異下,是否會產生違規的差異性。 由於違規並非監所內的常態事件,因此為增加違規樣本的抽取,所以本研究採立意抽樣,以場舍作為抽取單位,抽取收容較多違規紀錄受刑人之場舍進行施測,依此基礎下,本研究抽取北區兩個監所,使用共256個有效樣本進行分析。有關樣本分類,本研究將宣告刑期六年作為長短刑期的分界,而將樣本分成長短刑期兩個組別,在控制基本特性對違規的影響性之後,將會參考相關文獻把有關監禁環境的研究變項納入本研究的分析中,並且也把本研究想深入了解的累進處遇、縮刑與假釋制度的在意性同樣納入研究的分析中,而本研究的依變項將採用半年內有無違規、半年內有無多次違規(核心違規者)與半年內有無鬥毆違規等三個特性,而選擇半年內此種標準化定義,是希望能藉此排除違規次數隨時間增加而產生的累積效應,且也較能客觀地配合受試者目前之認知態度與在意程度進行後續之分析。 本研究從樣本分布中發現,長短刑期組在違規類型上有差異性,長刑期組較容易從事非暴力性的違規,而短刑期組則是較易從事暴力性違規,且兩組在服刑晚期時皆有核心違規者的出現。而從logistic迴歸的分析結果中發現,短刑期組入監次數越多與剛入監累進處遇級別較低者,是發生違規的高風險群;而長刑期組則是在監服刑時間越久,越有可能成為違規的高風險群。除此之外,研究也發現僅有短刑期組出現假釋與累進處遇制度對依變項產生顯著預測能力的情況。中介效應的檢驗發現,各變項皆是單獨且直接影響半年內的違規次數此依變項,因此不存在任何的中介效應。

In recent years, global criminal policy is more stringent. Prison is overcrowding because of excessive imprisonment. The proportion of prison administrators and inmates are imbalance. It’s caused a lot of violations in prisons. Violations serious impacted the stability of prisons and prison administrators have increased work pressure. Therefore, the issue should not be ignored. So this study will examine the different imprisonment inmates caused the different treatment of progressive treatment system, good time system, parole system may result in the violations occurred different. The study sampled two prisons. Data contained having violations inmate and no violations inmate. In this study use a total of 256 effective samples in the analysis. In addition, the sample was divided long imprisonment and short imprisonment according to the imprisonment of six year. After controlling for personal characteristics, this study will examine the cognitive attitude of different imprisonment inmates on progressive treatment system, good time system, parole system and their impacts on violations. The study displays that the long imprisonment inmate trend doing nonviolent violations, but the short imprisonment inmate trend doing violent violations. In addition, the results of logistic regression analysis found that the short imprisonment inmate who frequency into prison and progressive treatment system in low level is high risk of violations. On the other hand, the study display the long imprisonment inmate who stays in prison longer is high risk of violations, too. Moreover, the study also showing that only the short imprisonment inmates on the cognitive attitude of progressive treatment system, good time system, parole system, can affect violations.

資料來源:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/60001031873653366064

回頁首