按Enter到主內容區
:::

由人口販運防制法之實務運作探討性剝削女性被害人的在地化犯罪情境

  • 發布日期:
  • 最後更新日期:109-05-13
  • 資料點閱次數:1003

中文摘要:

 

人口販運(human trafficking)是重侵害人權的犯罪,已被全球各國視為現代奴隸問題,亦是聯合國公認的高獲利跨國組織犯罪模式。我國為有效防制人口販運犯案件,已於2009 年1月起公布實施「人口販運防制法」。然而在實務運作上,該法卻出現若干漏洞,以致境內外籍女子的人口販運問題非但無法有效解決,反而讓人口販運的保護措施成為掩護賣淫的護身符。
本文針對竹苗地區重複遭查獲賣淫的東南亞女子,探究其反覆墮入賣淫循環的制度因素。透過文獻分析與個案研究方法,試圖由賣淫女子的處境、安置制度的問題、以及執法人員的業績壓力,釐清各層面的問題關連,同時針對現存制度面的問題研擬因應配套措施,尤其著重於相關法制增修及實務策進之建議,以供國內相關治安機關偵辦相關案件之參考。
研究發現,執法機關對是類案件過於著重於「起訴」與「保護」面向,以致人口販運案件被害人(性剝削女性被害人)所享有之安置保護,被巧妙用來作為規避遣返的手段。而執法機關為求績效,在實務判斷上常發生「球員兼裁判」現象,將被害人重覆安置;復因安置單位無法監管被害人行蹤,使部分被害人基於犯罪相對利益之權衡,出現慣習性脫逃行為並再墮落風塵,以獲取較高報酬。在現行安置作業與遣返規定的縫隙中,這群「受害人」竟成為法外之民,而得以遊走在法律邊緣。此種情形不啻人權保護的反諷。
本文透過文獻分析與個案研究方法,針對我國防制人口販運案件之保護(性剝削之女性被害人)措施所衍生的問題,由法制面及實務面予以探討,進而釐清各層面的問題關連,同時針對現存制度面的問題研擬因應配套措施,尤其著重於相關法制增修及實務策進之建議,以供國內相關治安機關偵辦相關案件之參考。

 

英文摘要:

 

Human trafficking, regarded as contemporary slavery worldwide and generally accepted as the highly profitable transnational organized crime by the UN, is the crime of serious human rights violations. For the purpose of preventing human trafficking cases, “Human Trafficking Prevention Act” was announced by the Government of the Republic of China in January 2009. However, from this act, several flaws have been occurring since the effective date. Instead of well solving human trafficking problems for female foreign victims within Taiwan, the act becomes impregnable for those who utilize protections of it as cover for prostitution.
Research indicates that the agencies of enforcing the policies focus on “prosecution” as well as “protection” exceedingly, as a result, the protection or temporary placement, benefiting human trafficking victims (female victims of sex exploitation), artfully becomes the means of avoiding repatriation. Simultaneously, in order to getting better performance, the agencies, being self-policing, often makes practical misjudgments which lead to repeat temporary replacement. Moreover, since the unit of temporary placement is incapable of monitoring and tracking the victims, some of them, under weighing the comparative advantages over criminal activities, constantly make their escape and falls into being sex workers again so as to get paid more. In the gap between temporary placement and repatriation provisions, these marginalized victims, exploiting loopholes, turn into fugitives unexpectedly. Consequently, this circumstance is as satire of human rights.
In this article, methods of documentary analysis and case studies are applied to investigate, from the legal and practical sides, the extensive problems carried by the cases of protecting human trafficking victims (female victims of sex exploitation), and then clarify the related issues from every aspect. Meanwhile, supplementary measures, potentially seen as the references for the domestic prosecutor authority, are developed from the current systematic side, particularly the suggestions of amending law articles and advancing practices.

 

資料來源:

 

台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統

回頁首