中文摘要：

臺灣自2010年以來，已連續5年獲得美國「年度人口販運報告」評為「第一列」之殊榮，然中國大陸自2005年起，卻有9度遭評為「第二列觀察名單」，顯見兩岸對於防制「人口販運」之執行成效落差懸殊。2009年6月25日生效之《海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議》，明文規定「人口販運」係兩岸合作打擊犯罪項目之一，然直至2011年9月方出現合作偵辦「人口販運」犯罪之首例。
本研究訪談7名實務工作者發現，國內執法單位查緝「人口販運」犯罪所遭遇之困境包括：（一）績效評比影響案件偵辦品質，情資交流未必積極；（二）通訊監察實施困難，查緝不易且曠日廢時；（三）被害人鑑別與認定意見不一；（四）案件之「起訴率」及「定罪率」有待提升；（五）法定或判決刑度不高，無嚇阻作用；（六）經費編列不足，獎勵規定無誘因。
而兩岸合作查緝「人口販運」犯罪遭遇之困境包括：（一）法治觀念與案件性質之認知仍須溝通與磨合；（二）互信度有待提升；（三）情資交流受限於「單一案件」，回饋尚有進步空間；（四）偽（變）造之申請來臺資格證明文件查證不易；（五）偵查主體不同，影響偵辦進度；（六）相關法律規定之差異影響「證據能力」之認定；（七）「遣返原則」、法律「構成要件」及「刑責輕重」可能造成遣返力度有別。
本研究提出之建議為：（一）重新檢討績效評比模式，強化辦案品質與情資交流積極度；（二）人口販運犯罪明文納入通訊監察項目；（三）落實保障人口販運被害人之權益；（四）修正相關法律構成要件及提高刑度；（五）商議跨境合作案件「傳聞證據」採用之可能性或解決方式；（六）執法人員專業度與時俱進；（七）持續推動兩岸互設辦事機構，針對申請來臺案件建立「實質審查」機制；（八）增加預算編列以支持基層辦案及密集交流互訪。

英文摘要：

Since 2010, Taiwan has been listed as tier one country by the Annual TIP Report. However, China is always listed as tier-two watch-list country. Therefore, there is huge gap between China and Taiwan. The Cross-strait Joint Fight against Crime and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement, which was enacted on 25th June 2009, includes human trafficking as one of the missions of joint fight against crime. Nevertheless, the human trafficking crimes which were investigated based on this agreement were rare.
In order to fine out the reasons of the low number of cases, my research interviewed 7 practical officials. In conclusion, these findings pointed out 6 dimensions of difficulties at internal law enforcement, which includes departments’ competition lacking their cooperation, high tap limitation, different opinions of identifying victims, low prosecution and guilty rate, limp penalty, and lacked financial resource.
Besides, the difficulties at the investigation cooperation of two countries contains laws difference, trust shortage, intelligence-sharing limitation, uneasy to reveal forged documents, different standard of evidence ability, and unequal request of deportation.
Therefore, my research raised 8 suggestions to overcome current problems. Firstly, the law enforcement needs to renew the assessment model, enhance the investigation quality and intelligence exchange. Secondly, investigating human trafficking crime should allow tapping. Thirdly, the government should protect the rights of human trafficking persons and set up professional tram to identify victims. Fourthly, Taiwanese government needs to amend the conditions of human trafficking crime and raise the punishment. Fifthly, the two countries have to agree that the evidence ability can share at this cross-country crime. Sixthly, the government should provide continually training for the law enforcement officials. Seventhly, two governments should establish embassies to examine the applicants of coming to Taiwan. Lastly, the government has to increase to budget to support the first-line officials to reconnoiter crimes and working experiences exchange.

資料來源：

台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統